Publications

Architecture and Urbanism

alphabetically by authors’ surname

  • Ahmet, K. 2001. ‘A Middle Byzantine Olive Press Room at Aphrodisias,’ Anatolian Studies 51, 159–167.
  • Berenfeld, M. 2009. ‘The Triconch House and the Predecessors of the Bishop’s Palace at Aphrodisias,’ American Journal of Archaeology 113, 203–229.
  • Bier, L. 2008. ‘The Bouleuterion,’ in C. Ratté and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 70, 144–168.
  • Cormack, R. 1990a. ‘Byzantine Aphrodisias: Changing the Symbolic Map of a City,’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 36, 26–41.
  • Cormack, R. 1990b. ‘The Temple as the Cathedral,’ in C. Roueché and K. T. Erim (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers: Recent Work on Architecture and Sculpture. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 1, 75–88.
  • Crema, L. 1940. ‘I Monumenti Architettonici Afrodisiensi,’ Monumenti Antichi 38, 233–312.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. 1987. ‘Recherches sur la Frise de l’Agora de Tibère,’ in J. de la Genière and K. T. Erim (eds.), Aphrodisias de Carie, Colloque de l’Université de Lille III, 13 November 1985. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations, 135–154.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. 2006a. ‘Le Bâtiment de Scène du Théâtre d’Aphrodisias. Restitution et Étude Fonctionnelle de la Structure Scénique,’ in J.-Ch. Dumont (ed.), De la Tablette à la Scène: Actes du Colloque de Paris X, Nanterre, 31 Oct.-1 Nov. 2004. Toulouse, 57–70.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. 2006b. ‘La Frise Ionique à Masques Scéniques du Propylon du Sébasteion d’Aphrodisias,’ Revue Archéologique, 33–82.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. 2011. ‘Remarques sur la Syntaxe Décorative de la Frons Scaenae d’Aphrodisias: le Rôle des Décors en Bande,’ in F. D’Andria and I. Romeo (eds.), Roman Sculpture in Asia Minor. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 80, 77–90.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. 2012. ‘Le Théâtre d’Aphrodisias, Espace Civique et Identitaire,’ in O. Henry (ed.), Archéologies et Espaces Parcourus. Premières Rencontres d’Archéologie de l’IFEA, 11–13 Novembre 2010. Istanbul, 73–84.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. 2015. ‘The Carian Theatre in Aphrodisias: a Hybrid Building,’ in R. Frederiksen, E. Gebhard, and A. Sokolicek (eds.), Papers on the Architecture of the Ancient Greek Theatre, International Colloquium, Athens, January 27–28, 2012 at the Danish Institute, Athens. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 391–402.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. and Lemaire, A. 1996. ‘Le Portique de Tibère: Recherches sur son Architecture et sa Fonction,’ in C. Roueché and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 20, 149–172.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. and Theodorescu, D. 1991. ‘Recherches Préliminaires sur la Frons Scaenae du Théatre,’ in K. T. Erim and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 2: the Theatre, a Sculptor’s Workshop, Philosophers, and Coin-types. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 2, 29–65.
  • de Chaisemartin, N. and Theodorescu, D. 1992. ‘La Frons Scaenae du Théatre d’Aphrodisias, Aperçu sur les Recherches en Cours,’ Revue Archéologique, Bulletin de la SFAC, 181–187.
  • De Staebler, P. D. 2008a. ‘The City Wall and the Making of a Late-Antique Provincial Capital,’ in C. Ratté and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 70, 284–318.
  • De Staebler, P. D. 2008b. ‘Re-use of Carved Marble in the City Walls,’ in R. R. R. Smith and J. Lenaghan (eds.), Aphrodisias’tan Roma Portreleri (Roman Portraits from Aphrodisias). Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing, 184–199.
  • Erim, K. T. 1986. Aphrodisias: City of Venus Aphrodite. New York: Facts on File Publications.
  • Frey, L. 1994. ‘Aphrodisias de Carie: les Chapiteaux du Temple,’ in Le Projet de Vitruve. Objet, Destinataires et Réception du De Architectura. Rome: Collection de l’École Française de Rome 192, 123–137.
  • de la Genière, J. and Erim, K. T. (eds.) 1987. Aphrodisias de Carie, Colloque de l’Université de Lille III, 13 November 1985. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.
  • Gros, P. 1996. ‘Les Nouveaux Espaces Civiques du Début de l’Empire en Asie Mineure: les Exemples d’Ephèse, Iasos et Aphrodisias,’ in C. Roueché and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 20, 111–120.
  • Guy, M. 1996. ‘Apport de l’Interprétation des Images de SPOT à l’Exploration du Site,’ in C. Roueché and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 20, 74–80.
  • Hallett, C. H., and Quatember, U. 2018. ‘Three Bouleuteria from Roman and Late Antique Aphrodisia,’ in M. Aurenhammer (ed.), Sculpture in Roman Asia Minor: Proceedings of the International Conference at Selçuk 2013. Wien: Verlag Holzhausen GmbH, 353–364.
  • Hueber, F. 1998. ‘Werkrisse, Vorzeichnungen und Messmarken am Bühnengebäude des Theaters von Aphrodisias,’ Antike Welt 29, 439–445.
  • Ismaelli, A. 2011. ‘Una Nuova Proposta di Interpretazione per il Sebasteion di Aphrodisias: Attività Commerciali e Bancarie nel Santuario del Culto Imperiale,’ Mediterraneo Antico. Economie, Società, Culture 14, 149–202.
  • Jacobs, I. Forthcoming. ‘Resilience in Late Fifth-Century Aphrodisias: an Archaeological Perspective from the Tetrapylon Street,’ in R. Raja and A. Wilson (eds.), Catastrophes in Context: the Archaeology of Catastrophes from 1st–8th CE in the Mediterranean Region. Oxford.
  • Kaefer, T. 2016. ‘Anastylosis of the Sebasteion South Building: Methods and Techniques’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 279–91.
  • Kidd, A. 2018. ‘The Ionic Capitals from the South Stoa of Aphrodisias’ Urban Park: A Case Study of Urban Design in Late Antiquity,’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 68, 209–244.
  • Kidd, A. B. and Russell, B. 2022. ‘Polychrome Marble at Aphrodisias: The Interior Scheme of the North Stoa of the Place of Palms (‘Portico of Tiberius’),’ ASMOSIA: Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity 12, 105–114.
  • Kidd, A. B. 2024. ‘The New South Stoas,’ in A. I. Wilson and B. Russell (eds.), The Place of Palms: An Urban Park at Aphrodisias. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 79–90.
  • Kidd, A. B., Russell, B., Wilson A. I., et al. 2024. ‘After Antiquity: the Byzantine to Ottoman Periods,’ in A. I. Wilson and B. Russell (eds.), The Place of Palms: An Urban Park at Aphrodisias. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 229–268.
  • Lockey, I. 2016. ‘The Atrium House: the Archaeology of a Late-Antique Residence’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 243–254.
  • McDavid, A. 2016. ‘Renovation in the Hadrianic Baths in Late Antiquity’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 209–224.
  • Öğüş, E. 2015. ‘A Late-Antique Fountain at Aphrodisias and its Implications for Spoliation Practices,’ Journal of Roman Archaeology 28, 302–324.
  • Outschar, U. 1996. ‘Zur Baudekoration und Typologischen Stellung des Tetrapylons,’ in C. Roueché and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 20, 215–224.
  • Öztürk, A. 2016. ‘The Architecture of the Hadrianic Baths in their Original Phase’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012, Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 195–208.
  • Paul, G. 1996. ‘Die Anastylose des Tetrapylons,’ in C. Roueché and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 20, 201–214.
  • Paul, G. 2016. ‘Roman Building Practice in Aphrodisias’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 269–278.
  • Quatember, U. 2019a. ‘The Bouleuterion and Its Environs in Early Imperial Aphrodisias,’ Journal of Roman Archaeology 32, 517–528.
  • Quatember, U. 2019b. ‘The Bouleuterion Court of Aphrodisias in Caria. A Case Study of the Adaptation of Urban Space in Asia Minor from the Roman Imperial Period to Late Antiquity and Beyond,’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 69, 59–102.
  • Quatember, U. 2020. ‘Vom Rathaus zur Palästra. Das Bouleuterion von Aphrodisias,’ in K. Piesker and U. Wulf-Rheidt (eds.), Umgebaut: Umbau-, Umnutzungs- und Umwertungsprozesse in der antiken Architektur. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner, 415–422.
  • Ratté, C. 2000a. ‘New Research on the City Plan of Ancient Aphrodisias,’ in D. C. Hopkins (ed.), Across the Anatolian Plateau: Readings in the Archaeology of Ancient Turkey. Boston: Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research 57, 197–203.
  • Ratté, C. 2000b. ‘The Urban Development of Aphrodisias in the Late Hellenistic and Early Imperial Periods,’ in C. Berns et al. (eds.), Kontinuität und Diskontinuität in den Städten frühkaiserzeitlichen Kleinasiens. Munich: Fink, 5–32.
  • Ratté, C. 2001. ‘New Research on the Urban Development of Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity,’ in D. Parrish (ed.), Urbanism in Western Asia Minor: New studies on Aphrodisias, Ephesos, Hierapolis, Pergamon, Perge and Xanthos. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 45, 116–147.
  • Ratté, C. 2003. ‘Landliche Urbanisierung – der Fall Aphrodisias,’ in U. Dirschedl (ed.), Die Stadt als Großbaustelle: Von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit. Internationaler Kongreß vom 7. bis 11. November 2001 im Auswärtigen Amt, Berlin. Berlin, 66–73.
  • Ratté, C. 2006. ‘Aphrodisias,’ in W. Radt. (ed.), Stadtgrabungen und Stadtforschung im westlichen Kleinasien: Geplantes und Erreichtes. Internationales Symposion 6./7. August 2004 in Bergama (Turkey), Istanbul: Ege Yayınları, 37–48.
  • Ratté, C. 2008. ‘The Founding of Aphrodisias,’ in C. Ratté and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 70, 7–36.
  • Ratté, C. 2023. ‘Rural Fortifications in the Region around Aphrodisias,’ Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 92 (2023), 673–721.
  • Smith, R. R. R. and Ertuğ, A. 2009. Aphrodisias: City and Sculpture in Roman Asia. Istanbul: Ertuğ & Kocabıyık.
  • Stinson, P. 2007. ‘Imitation and Adaptation in Architectural Design: Two Roman Basilicas at Ephesus and Aphrodisias,’ in M. Meyer (ed.), Neue Zeiten – neue Sitten: zu Rezeption und Integration römischen und italischen Kulturguts in Kleinasien. Vienna: Phoibos, 91–100.
  • Stinson, P. 2008a. ‘The Civil Basilica: Urban Context, Design, and Significance,’ in C. Ratté and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 70, 79–106.
  • Stinson, P. 2008b. ‘Ornamentation and the City,’ in R. R. R. Smith and J. Lenaghan (eds.), Aphrodisias’tan Roma Portreleri (Roman Portraits from Aphrodisias). Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing, 54–69.
  • Stinson, P. 2012. ‘Local Meanings of the Civil Basilica at Aphrodisias: Image, Text, and Monument,’ in L. Cavalier (ed.), Proceedings of Atelier d’Architecture Antique. Les Basiliques civiles en Grèce et en Asie Mineure, Université Michel de Montaigne–Bordeaux III. Apr. 7-8, 2008, Bordeaux, France. Bordeaux, 107–26.
  • Stinson, P. 2019. ‘The Multifaceted Architectural Refinements in the Julio-Claudian Sebasteion at Aphrodisias,’ Journal of Roman Archaeology 32, 39–66.
  • Stinson, P. Forthcoming. ‘Digital Roman Architecture in Aphrodisias,’ in R. Raja, O. Bobou, and E. Barker (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Classical Studies. Oxford, ch. 58.
  • Theodorescu, D. 1994. ‘De Ionica Symmetria à Aphrodisias de Carie, Quelques Réflexions,’ in Le Projet de Vitruve. objet, destinataires et réception du De Architectura. Rome : Collection de l’École Française de Rome 192, 105–122.
  • Theodorescu, D. 1996. ‘La Frons Scaenae du Théatre: Innovations et Particularités à l’Époque de Zoilos,’ in C. Roueché and R. R. R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 3: The Setting and Quarries, Mythological and Other Sculptural Decoration, Architectural Development, Portico of Tiberius, and Tetrapylon. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 20, 127–148.
  • Welch, K. 1998. ‘The Stadium at Aphrodisias,’ American Journal of Archaeology 102, 547–569.
  • Wilson, A. 2016a. ‘The Olympian (Hadrianic) Baths: Layout, Operation, and Financing’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 168–194.
  • Wilson, A. 2016b. ‘Water, Nymphs, and a Palm Grove: Monumental Water Display at Aphrodisias’ in R. R. R. Smith et al. (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 5: Excavation and Research at Aphrodisias, 2006–2012. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 103, 100–135.
  • Wilson, A. 2019a. ‘Earthquakes at Aphrodisias,’ in C. M. Draycott, R. Raja, K. Welch, and W. T. Wootton (eds.), Visual Histories of the Classical World: Essays in Honour of R. R. R. Smith. Turnhout: Brepols, 469–488.
  • Wilson, A. 2019b. ‘Aphrodisias in the Long Sixth Century’ in I. Jacobs and H. Elton (eds.), Asia Minor in the Long Sixth Century. Current Research and Future Directions. Oxford: Oxbow, 192–221.
  • Wilson, A. I., Russell, B., Kidd, A. B., et al. 2024. ‘Use, Maintenance, and Modification, First to Fourth Centuries AD,’ in A. I. Wilson and B. Russell (eds.), The Place of Palms: An Urban Park at Aphrodisias. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 39–64.
  • Wilson, A. I., Russell, B., Kidd, A. B., et al. 2024. “The End of the Place of Palms, Seventh Century AD,” in A. I. Wilson and B. Russell (eds.), The Place of Palms: An Urban Park at Aphrodisias. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 183–228.
  • Wilson, A. and Russell, B. 2024. The Place of Palms: an Urban Park at Aphrodisias. Results of The Mica and Ahmet Ertegün South Agora Pool Project. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
  • Yıldırım, B. 2008. ‘Aphrodisias: City and Public Buildings,’ in R. R. R. Smith and J. L. Lenaghan (eds.), Aphrodisias’tan Roma Portreleri (Roman Portraits from Aphrodisias). Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing, 34–53.

Download the complete current Aphrodisias Bibliography 2025 (.pdf)